 |
|
List Archives >
Maple User Group List Archive >
Archive by date >
This Month By Date >
This Month By Topic
[MUG] Re: RFC On 2nd List
| [MUG] Re: RFC On 2nd List |
|
Author: Maple Group
Posted: 23/10/2000 13:56:02 GDT
|
>> From: Maple Group "maple_gr"
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Jason C. Leach wrote:
| I welcome any comments on a a second MUG list. I'd like to start one that
| is not so moderated so that posts get out to the rest of the group as soon
| as they are posted. It would also allow for digests so all the daily mail
| is batched into one message for those who would like it that way, and of
| coarse a public access archive.
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Israel "israel"
To: Maple User Group "maple-list"
Subject: RFC On 2nd List.
Why not just use the newsgroup comp.soft-sys.math.maple?
Robert Israel "israel"
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
From: "Nathan Sokalski" "njsokalski"
To: "maple-list"
Subject: RFC On 2nd List.
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:35:40 EDT
I agree with you on the fact that it can be frustrating to not have the
messages not sent out immediately. But I am unsure about what would happen
if users were split up into 2 mailing lists. But there is one thing I do
think you could do other than immediate distribution that would be an
improvement on this list. I often like to keep the advice I am given (and
some responses to other's questions), but I sometimes delete advice to
other's questions that I end up wanting in the future. I feel it would be
much more convenient and efficient to use a newsgroup rather than a mailing
list. A newsgroup would allow me (and others) to look back at past responses
without needing to fill up our mailboxes and we could also see all the Maple
stuff in one place. But whether it is a mailing list or newsgroup, I would
still like to hear about it.
Nathan Sokalski
"njsokalski"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
|
[View Complete Thread]
Previous by date: [MUG] Re: FFT, Maple Group
Next by date: [MUG] Re: solving linear equation, Maple Group
Previous thread: [MUG] Curiosity, Jim Gunson
Next thread: [MUG] solving linear equation, Alain Goupil
|
|
|
 |
Product Reviews |
"Without the Maple software, we would have to spend weeks generating the equations of motion for every experiment. Then the chances that we did it right would basically be near zero. There would always be a mistake somewhere. It is very difficult to set up a dynamic motion model by hand."
- Jean-Claude PiedBeouf, Ph.D Manager of Robotics, Canadian Space Agency
"Its very good - highly accurate and easy to use. The speed of Maple allows me to change equations and quickly reintegrate them into the application, so more possibilities can be explored to achieve the precise effect desired."
Shawn Neely, Senior R & D Director for PDI/Dreamworks |
|
|
|
|
Connectors